Bill Totten's Weblog

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Whitewashing Hiroshima

The Uncritical Glorification of American Militarism

by Gary G Kohls, MD (August 06 2004)

Back in 1995, the Smithsonian Institute was preparing an honest but aggressive display dealing with the fiftieth anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Amid much right-wing reactionary wrangling, from various ultrapatriotic veterans groups all the way up to the Newt Gringrich-dominated Congress, the Smithsonian was forced to eliminate that painful but historically important part of the story - the Japanese civilian perspective. So again we had another example of powerful politically conservative ultrapatriotic groups influencing public policy - and messing with history because they didn't have the courage to face up to unpleasant historical truths.

The historians did have a gun to their heads, of course, but in the melee, the media and the public overlooked a vital historical point. And that is this: The two bombs did not have to be used to end the war and there wouldn't have been a bloody American invasion of Japan. American intelligence, with the full knowledge of President Truman, was fully aware of Japan's desperate search for ways to honorably surrender weeks before the order was given for the American-led nuclear Holocaust that was Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

American intelligence data, revealed in the 1980s, show that a large-scale US invasion (planned for no sooner than November 1 1945) would have been unnecessary. Japan was working on peace negotiations with the Allies through its Moscow ambassador in July of 1945. Truman knew of these developments because the US had broken the Japanese code years earlier, and all of Japan's military and diplomatic messages were being intercepted. On July 13 1945, Foreign Minister Togo said: "Unconditional surrender (giving up all sovereignty) is the only obstacle to peace". Truman knew this, and the war could have ended by simply conceding a post-war figurehead position for the emperor, a leader regarded as a deity in Japan. That concession was refused by the US; the Japanese continued negotiating for peace; and the bombs were dropped. And, ironically, after the war, the emperor was allowed to remain in place. So what were the real reasons for (1) the refusal to accept Japan's offer of surrender and (2) the decision to proceed with the bombings?

Shortly after World War Two, military analyst Hanson Baldwin wrote: "The Japanese, in a military sense, were in a hopeless strategic situation by the time the Potsdam demand for unconditional surrender was made on July 26 1945". Admiral William Leahy, top military aide to President Truman, said in his war memoirs, I Was There (1950):

It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons. My own feeling is that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages.

And General Dwight Eisenhower agreed.

Truman proceeded with the plans, but he never officially ordered the Nagasaki bomb that followed Hiroshima. There are a number of factors that helped Truman make his decision.

1. The US had made a huge investment in time, mind and money ($2,000,000,000 in 1940 dollars) to produce the bombs, and there was no inclination - and no guts - to stop the momentum.

2. The US military - as did its citizens - had a bloodthirsty appetite for revenge because of Pearl Harbor. Mercy wasn't the mind-set of these professed Christians, and the missions were accomplished - with glee.

3. The Nagasaki bomb was a plutonium bomb and Hiroshima's was uranium. Scientific curiosity certainly was a major factor at Nagasaki. The decision to use both had obviously been made well in advance. The three day interval was unconscionably inadequate - Japan being in shambles in its communications and transportation capabilities - and no one, not even the Japanese high command, fully understood what had happened at Hiroshima.

4. The Russians had proclaimed their intent to enter the war with Japan ninety days after V-E Day, which would have been August 8th, two days after Hiroshima. Indeed, Russia did declare war on August 8th and was marching across Manchuria when the innocent civilians of Nagasaki were incinerated. The US didn't want Japan surrendering to anybody else, especially an upcoming enemy, so the first nuclear "messages" of the infantile Cold War were sent. Russia indeed received less of the spoils of war, and the two superpowers were mired in mutual moral and economic near-bankruptcy for the rest of the century - with no end in sight.

An estimated 80,000 innocent civilians - plus 20,000 young, essentially weaponless Japanese conscripts - died instantly in the Hiroshima bombing. Hundreds of thousands of others suffered agonizing burns and infections for the rest of their shortened lives, and generations of the survivor's progeny inherited horrible radiation-induced illnesses, cancers and premature death. What has been covered up is the fact that twelve American POWs, Navy pilots, their existence well known to the US command, were killed in a Hiroshima jail on August 6th.

The 75,000 Nagasaki victims were virtually all innocent civilians, except for the inhabitants of an allied POW camp near Nagasaki's ground zero. They were instantaneously incinerated, carbonized and evaporated by a scientific experiment carried out by obedient, unaware soldiers. The War Department knew of the existence of the POWs but, when informed, simply replied: "Targets previously assigned for Centerboard (atomic bomb mission code name) remain unchanged".

So the end of the war in the Pacific was just one more myth in a long list of myths we have been fed by our military and political leaders, war being glorified in the process. A short list of some of the others include the covered-up military actions (and frequently CIA-orchestrated atrocities) in Korea, Viet Nam, Laos, Cambodia, Granada, Panama, Iraq, the Philippines, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Haiti, Colombia, et cetera, et cetera. But somehow we still hang on to our shaky "my country right or wrong" patriotism, desperately wanting to believe that our nation only works for peace, justice and democracy and not mainly for the form of capitalism that has been corrupted to its core. While it is true that the US military has faced down a few despots, with natural heroism and sacrifice from the physically, psychologically and spiritually dead and dying American soldiers, more often than not our methods of rationalizing the atrocities of war are identical to those of the "godless communists" or "evil empire" on the other side of the battle line. August 6th and 9th 1945 are just two more examples of the brutalization of innocent civilians in "total war", whether it is called "'regretful' collateral damage" or "friendly fire".

The time has come for Americans to stand up for real justice and real peace (rather than the fake variety of our unaffordable "armed truces" that we have all over the world) by acknowledging the whole truth of history and owning up to the numerous censored-out American war crimes and crimes against humanity, that have been perpetrated in our names over the last half-century. And then we need to start accepting the consequences of our nation's actions, like the courageous and honorable people we claim to be. Doing what is right for the whole of humanity for a change, rather than just what is advantageous for us already over-privileged Americans, would be real honor, real patriotism and an essential start toward real peace.


Gary Kohls, MD, is a practicing physician in Duluth, Minnesota and an associate of Every Church a Peace Church:

His mail address is

Copyright (c) 2001 Gary G Kohls, MD

Bill Totten


Post a Comment

<< Home