Bill Totten's Weblog

Saturday, November 20, 2010

Techno-Optimism Meets Its Match

by Guy R McPherson (November 15 2010) (November 16 2010)

According to the extremely conservative International Energy Agency (IEA), we've passed the world peak for conventional oil (in 2006, they say). In a stunning nod to reality, even the New York Times agrees. In a bizarre case of committee-style cognitive dissonance, the IEA follows up on the admission that peak oil has come and gone with the conclusion that energy will never limit economic growth. In short, World Energy Outlook 2010 {1} is (1) characterized by questionable assumptions and major omissions {2}, or (2) a cry for help {3}. Maybe both.

Not that we should believe IEA about anything related to oil. This is the gang that promised an annual decline rate of 9.1% in conventional oil, beginning in 2009. We're holding at a decline rate of about three percent, year over year, since early 2009.

Techno-optimists take note: It'll take 131 years to replace oil {4}. Not 130, and not 132, but 131. And we don't have 4.9147 years left in the Age of Oil. That might prove problematic.

World oil production by type in the New Policies Scenario {5}

Taking a turn to the other side of the fossil-fuel coin, the IEA devastatingly projects global temperature will rise 3.5 degrees celsius by 2035 {6}. This prediction comes on the heels of increasingly dire projections, the latter of which all suggest habitat for humans will be gone from this planet by mid-century. I remain optimistic because none of these projections acknowledge physical limits on combustion of fossil fuels. That is, they fail to acknowledge the truly good news of economic collapse for our species and many others.

If we accept the IEA's analysis and prediction, the few humans on the planet by 2035 won't be worried about the price of air fare. We can only hope the projection for global temperature is based on the same kind of fuzzy logic used to conclude we've passed the world oil peak, then conclude we never will. Or we can hope the IEA is using climate change to justify economic collapse contraction. I suspect we'll see a lot of this type of argument in the coming months, as the world's industrial economy goes up in flames.

Just when you thought the Great Bank Robbery (aka Great Recession) {7} was over, it turns out the courts are helping the banks steal money from homeowners. No surprise there, of course: Civilization is properly defined as the transfer of fiat currency from those who have little of it to those who have a lot. And there is nobody more civilized than Bernanke and Obama, as indicated by the way they spend money on (print money for) bank executives instead of us "little" people {8}. If you have a sense of humor about the economic apocalypse, check out the video below {9}, bearing in mind that if you can laugh at yourself, and you can laugh at the apocalypse, then you'll never run out of material.

Fortunately, regardless of the lies {10} by the likes of Geithner, Bernanke, and Obama, the days of fiat currency are just about behind us {11} as collapse of the industrial economy nears completion. Ireland is the new Greece, but the US is dogging {12} both countries on the path to insolvency. Historian Niall Ferguson describes one plausible outcome here. Regardless of the details, soon - and perhaps soon enough, though only time will tell - we'll be using Federal Reserve Notes as toilet paper or fire-starter, which will be handy when we can't find either product at the grocery store.

The American Dream, which is based on never-ending economic growth, is over. Change is coming {13}, and it's not the peaceful kind. But it's bound to be better than living in country governed by war criminals {14} who are adorned with Nobel Peace prizes.

The TechnoMessiah has met Reality. As with the Federal Reserve's money-printing versus the secular bear market {15}, there can be only one winner. I'm betting on Reality, in a rout.

















Guy R McPherson is Profesor Emeritus at the University of Arizona. Educated in the ecology and management of natural resources, his early scholarly efforts produced many publications of little lasting importance. In mid-career, he began to focus on development and creative application of ecological theory, primarily with an eye toward conservation of biological diversity. Currently, his scholarly efforts focus on social criticism, with results that appear most frequently on newspaper op-ed pages. In addition, he facilitates research by students and he prepares synthetic documents focused on articulation of the links between (1) environmental protection, social justice, and the human economy and (2) science and its application. These efforts have produced more than 100 scholarly papers and nine books.

In 2009 at the height of a productive career, McPherson left the university to prepare for collapse. He now lives in an off-grid, straw-bale house where he puts into practice his lifelong interest in sustainable living via organic gardening, raising small animals for eggs and milk, and working with members of his rural community. He Blogs at

contact information:

Guy R McPherson, Professor Emeritus
University of Arizona
School of Natural Resources & the Environment and
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology
Biological Sciences East 325
Tucson, Arizona 85721


Bill Totten


Post a Comment

<< Home