WikiLeaks: Whose Agenda?
by Jeff Gates
dissidentvoice.org (December 20 2010)
Those tracking the agenda now advancing behind the WikiLeaks façade should check for the undisclosed bias among editors at the four newspapers chosen to select what was leaked. And when it was leaked.
The pro-Israeli bias of The New York Times needs no citations. In London, WikiLeaks releases are overseen by Deputy Editor Ian Katz at The Guardian. What about Le Monde in Paris and Der Spiegel in Berlin?
The tipping point for German media dates to 2003 when Haim Saban purchased ProSiebenSat1, Germany's second largest media conglomerate. Why this particular acquisition? Because "Germany is critical to Israel" conceded Steve Rattner, Saban's investment banker - now under indictment in New York for fraud.
Saban's support was key to putting Angela Merkel in office in 2005. Thus Netanyahu's comment on November 29th about Germany becoming Israel's new 'partner for peace' in the Middle East - while Tel Aviv collapsed US-sponsored peace talks.
On December 10th, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington to announce the end of this latest charade of talks.
Saban has long been close to the Clintons. Ex-President Bill Clinton helped him sell advertising. Though Saban paid for the building now housing the Democratic National Committee, he is doubtless thrilled that Republican Congressman, Eric Cantor, a Jewish-Zionist, will take the reins in January as House Majority Leader.
Both political parties are critical to Israel.
Entropy - Again
The collapse of peace talks marked the success of yet another Israeli entropy strategy. When negotiating with Zionists, the relevant question is always: What's Next From Israel: Entropy or Outrage? {1} Take your pick: perpetual delay or another well-timed provocation. Or both.
In 2007, Saban, a self-described Zionist, acquired control of Univision, the most popular US media outlet for Latinos. As America's fastest-growing voting bloc, their support is also critical to Israel. This latest acquisition confirms the systematic embedding of pro-Israeli influence in opinion-shaping domains, including media, think tanks and politics.
Israel is waging war on the US by way of deception. That strategy can only succeed if this war is waged in plain sight by its adept game theory war planners {2}.
Tel Aviv's agenda requires a critical mass of control over key "in between" domains - between "the mark" (that's us) and the facts that We The People require for a system of governance reliant on our informed consent.
The modus operandi on display at every turn: displacement of facts with false beliefs.
Thus the role of media, think tanks and pro-Israeli policy-makers in selling Americans on consensus beliefs around Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague, Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories and Iraqi uranium from Niger. All were false yet all were widely believed.
The entirety of the phony intelligence that induced the US to invade Iraq is traceable to Israeli or pro-Israeli sources. The invasion was marketed to a trusting American public by a mainstream media dominated by those sharing the same undisclosed bias.
In the Information Age, if that's not treason, what is?
With Friends Like This ...
When in human history were fabricated beliefs first deployed to deceive? At the heart of this ancient craft one finds proponents of the oldest of the three "religions of the book" promoting a "Clash" between its two derivatives: Christianity and Islam.
Displacement is the key to this mental and emotional manipulation. Within hours of WikiLeak's November release of diplomatic cables, peace talks were displaced by renewed talk of war with Iran. WikiLeaks concedes it had those cables since May.
Barack Obama has no better grasp of this long-running treachery than George Bush, Bill Clinton, G H W Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Coolidge, Harding or Wilson.
Only with clarity on the common source of this duplicity can a long-deceived global public ensure accountability for the many conflicts engineered by those skilled at pitting two sides against the middle while profiting off the misery of both.
By wielding their influence in key in-between domains, those complicit prey on the good faith of others. We Americans will remain unwitting players in a fabricated drama (The Clash of Civilizations) so long as we believe a narrative sustained in plain sight by those skilled at deception.
To betray, one must first befriend; to deceive, one must first create a relationship of trust. No one can persuade Americans to forfeit their freedom. We must be induced to freely embrace the forces that, step-by-step, displace our freedom. That's called Zionism.
To restore the true self to self-governance requires that Americans recover enough self-confidence to follow facts wherever they may lead. And trust in themselves enough to act consistent with those facts - despite what those complicit would deceive them to believe.
Our freedom now depends on it.
_____
Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association (2008), Democracy at Risk (2001), and The Ownership Solution (1999). Read other articles by Jeff {3} or visit Jeff's website {4}.
Links:
{1} http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/05/02/what%E2%80%99s-next-from-israel-entropy-or-outrage/
{2} http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=15372
{3} http://dissidentvoice.org/author/JeffGates/
{4} http://www.criminalstate.com/
http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/wikileaks-whose-agenda/#more-26777
Bill Totten http://www.ashisuto.co.jp/english/
dissidentvoice.org (December 20 2010)
Those tracking the agenda now advancing behind the WikiLeaks façade should check for the undisclosed bias among editors at the four newspapers chosen to select what was leaked. And when it was leaked.
The pro-Israeli bias of The New York Times needs no citations. In London, WikiLeaks releases are overseen by Deputy Editor Ian Katz at The Guardian. What about Le Monde in Paris and Der Spiegel in Berlin?
The tipping point for German media dates to 2003 when Haim Saban purchased ProSiebenSat1, Germany's second largest media conglomerate. Why this particular acquisition? Because "Germany is critical to Israel" conceded Steve Rattner, Saban's investment banker - now under indictment in New York for fraud.
Saban's support was key to putting Angela Merkel in office in 2005. Thus Netanyahu's comment on November 29th about Germany becoming Israel's new 'partner for peace' in the Middle East - while Tel Aviv collapsed US-sponsored peace talks.
On December 10th, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose the Saban Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington to announce the end of this latest charade of talks.
Saban has long been close to the Clintons. Ex-President Bill Clinton helped him sell advertising. Though Saban paid for the building now housing the Democratic National Committee, he is doubtless thrilled that Republican Congressman, Eric Cantor, a Jewish-Zionist, will take the reins in January as House Majority Leader.
Both political parties are critical to Israel.
Entropy - Again
The collapse of peace talks marked the success of yet another Israeli entropy strategy. When negotiating with Zionists, the relevant question is always: What's Next From Israel: Entropy or Outrage? {1} Take your pick: perpetual delay or another well-timed provocation. Or both.
In 2007, Saban, a self-described Zionist, acquired control of Univision, the most popular US media outlet for Latinos. As America's fastest-growing voting bloc, their support is also critical to Israel. This latest acquisition confirms the systematic embedding of pro-Israeli influence in opinion-shaping domains, including media, think tanks and politics.
Israel is waging war on the US by way of deception. That strategy can only succeed if this war is waged in plain sight by its adept game theory war planners {2}.
Tel Aviv's agenda requires a critical mass of control over key "in between" domains - between "the mark" (that's us) and the facts that We The People require for a system of governance reliant on our informed consent.
The modus operandi on display at every turn: displacement of facts with false beliefs.
Thus the role of media, think tanks and pro-Israeli policy-makers in selling Americans on consensus beliefs around Iraqi WMD, Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda, Iraqi meetings with Al Qaeda in Prague, Iraqi mobile biological weapons laboratories and Iraqi uranium from Niger. All were false yet all were widely believed.
The entirety of the phony intelligence that induced the US to invade Iraq is traceable to Israeli or pro-Israeli sources. The invasion was marketed to a trusting American public by a mainstream media dominated by those sharing the same undisclosed bias.
In the Information Age, if that's not treason, what is?
With Friends Like This ...
When in human history were fabricated beliefs first deployed to deceive? At the heart of this ancient craft one finds proponents of the oldest of the three "religions of the book" promoting a "Clash" between its two derivatives: Christianity and Islam.
Displacement is the key to this mental and emotional manipulation. Within hours of WikiLeak's November release of diplomatic cables, peace talks were displaced by renewed talk of war with Iran. WikiLeaks concedes it had those cables since May.
Barack Obama has no better grasp of this long-running treachery than George Bush, Bill Clinton, G H W Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR, Coolidge, Harding or Wilson.
Only with clarity on the common source of this duplicity can a long-deceived global public ensure accountability for the many conflicts engineered by those skilled at pitting two sides against the middle while profiting off the misery of both.
By wielding their influence in key in-between domains, those complicit prey on the good faith of others. We Americans will remain unwitting players in a fabricated drama (The Clash of Civilizations) so long as we believe a narrative sustained in plain sight by those skilled at deception.
To betray, one must first befriend; to deceive, one must first create a relationship of trust. No one can persuade Americans to forfeit their freedom. We must be induced to freely embrace the forces that, step-by-step, displace our freedom. That's called Zionism.
To restore the true self to self-governance requires that Americans recover enough self-confidence to follow facts wherever they may lead. And trust in themselves enough to act consistent with those facts - despite what those complicit would deceive them to believe.
Our freedom now depends on it.
_____
Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association (2008), Democracy at Risk (2001), and The Ownership Solution (1999). Read other articles by Jeff {3} or visit Jeff's website {4}.
Links:
{1} http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/05/02/what%E2%80%99s-next-from-israel-entropy-or-outrage/
{2} http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=15372
{3} http://dissidentvoice.org/author/JeffGates/
{4} http://www.criminalstate.com/
http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/wikileaks-whose-agenda/#more-26777
Bill Totten http://www.ashisuto.co.jp/english/
posted by Bill Totten at
9:03 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home